Yesterday, in an attempt to prod myself out of the lethargy I seem to have acquired during my battle with walking pneumonia, and the toll in energy spent during my wonderful, but tiring trip to Pennsylvania and the annual family reunion, I visited several blogs hoping for some inspiration. One in particular caught my attention, and I’ve taken the liberty of lifting a few words that caused me to cogitate. I love using that word because it was the word that first stirred me “awake”, that caused me to first question all religious theology.
Now I dislike using another’s words in any of my own writing, but in this case I don’t have much choice if I wish to make a point clear. Verbatim, and understand, these are not my words: but if God caused his Son to be born a perfect man, and his life course counterbalances that of the only other perfect man, Adam, and thus can buy back, or redeem, what Adam lost … you must admit there is some internal logic there, and not just some gooey “God died for us to show how much he loves us.” Moreover, if god wants us in heaven, as all religions believe— except for Jehovah’s Witnesses—why didn’t he put us there in the first place, for crying out loud?
Now I hereby concede that that is one beautifully, thought-out question and, my hat’s off to the author. The question deserves some serious consideration, that is, until a bit of logical thinking is brought into play. Remember, Jehovah—God—is omniscient as well as omnipotent. Using the same reasoning my fellow-blogger used, I’ll ask: if God—Jehovah—first intended for Adam and Eve and their offspring to live on earth forever—just like Jehovah Witnesses believe they will, after something called Armageddon takes place, then, Why, for crying out loud, did God—Jehovah—plant that “forbidden apple tree” in the Garden of Eden knowing full well that both Eve and Adam were going to disobey orders? Why, for crying out loud, didn’t God—Jehovah—simply cut that “walking, talking snake, Satan” off at the knees before he had a chance to “talk”, first Eve, then, through Eve, Adam into sinning? Why, for crying out loud, would God—Jehovah–go through all that b…s…, about sin and the shedding of blood to atone for sin—both human and animal—when, in the long run, humans, that is, certain humans, are still going to live on the earth forever. Sure puzzles the hell out of me.
Yes, Why?
September 6, 2009 by mary a. kaufman
I don’t understand it, either, Mary. I really don’t. Religious ideology is not without its contradictions. Sometimes things just don’t add up.
Sema, thanks, really thanks, but things do “add up” if one just remembers this: the human brain is, as far as anyone knows, the only brain in a living body with the ability to imagine the impossible and to believe in the improbable.
The Christian Bible is just another book, one of many written by men who, no doubt thought “God” was speaking directly to them, but were sadly and badly mistaken. Christians reject all other “Holy” books and do so without fear of punishment either in the “now” or in some afterlife. I simply reject one more “Holy” book than do Christians.
HA! for crying out loud. Just noticed this post after responding to your more recent one on God’s omniscience, and apparently not giving the answer you expected, and just as apparently (and unforgivably) not paying adequate attention to format, form, and so forth.
No, he’s not omniscient, which, if it doesn’t completely answer questions you propose, at least it encourages you to supplement them with others.
Exactly what things does he know up front and what does he not? Well….I’m not sure I know – or that it matters. Maybe it’s a bit like encountering the university prof on a subject of which you know nothing. Does he know everything about that subject? Well…..dunno what he knows and what he doesn’t know, but he sure knows more than me.
I’m happy to see that your blog continues and has found an audience, Mary. It’s quality, and offers the unusual feature of being writen by a person who’s been around long enough to distinquish fads and fluff from more enduring ideas (even if we disagree a bit….actually, quite a bit. No matter. I like your blog.)
Tom, it’s always a pleasure when you visit me via Meander With Me. That’s quite a lovely compliment you’ve given me and I sincerely thank you for it.